I
don’t think that I am giving out any new information when I say that we live in
a world rife with terror, disease, famine, war, and crime, as well as a host of
natural disasters that can strike without warning. In fact, I found examples of
each of those calamities in today’s newspaper—and all I read is the sports
section and the comics. Tragedy seems to be a by-product of civilization. Some
catastrophes are as naturally-occurring as the air we breathe, but most are
man-made. Although I pride myself on being almost completely desensitized to
the pain and suffering of others, there are occasions when I come across a news
report of some horrific event about which I think I should probably feel bad.
That’s almost like caring, isn’t it?
Over
the years I have developed something I call the Disaster Grief Index to
help me gauge the degree to which I should feign anguish when I read about the
misery of others. The model for my index was taken from how television news
covers these events. I figure if CNN deems something to be important, then I
should, too. Let me walk you through this.
First
of all, you should primarily only care about bad things happening to Americans.
The way that television news explains it, if tragedy strikes non-Americans then
they probably have it coming. Maybe they should try being more careful. If TV
is somehow coerced into covering a disaster in some far-off land it is only
because the event is of biblical proportions. CNN uses a sliding scale formula
in order to calculate when deaths are reported. They have made a computation as
to how viewers should regard the deaths of total strangers.
1 American life =
10 English-speaking non-Americans
50 Europeans who speak a language other than English
1,000 Latin Americans
10,000 Asians
1,000,000 Africans (except white, English-speaking Africans)
10 English-speaking non-Americans
50 Europeans who speak a language other than English
1,000 Latin Americans
10,000 Asians
1,000,000 Africans (except white, English-speaking Africans)
The
way this works is if one American dies then that is news, but it takes ten
British people to die to warrant the same coverage as the lone American death.
Let’s be honest with ourselves, do any of us have time to hear a story about
5,000 Chinese people whose bus went off a cliff? Anything less than one million
Africans perishing will be relegated to a small segment that airs somewhere
between celebrity news and a funny security video of someone accidentally being
sprayed by a shaken-up can of soda. It is called proportionality and it is how
we make it through the day without being crippled by anxiety.
Before
you accuse television reporters of being heartless pricks, let me remind you
that people die every day, or almost every day (I have a birthday coming up so
I would appreciate it if everyone whose time is almost out to die either the
day before or the day after). You can’t get worked up every time a tidal wave
slams into some country you can’t even pronounce, let alone find on a map.
According to CNN, what completely shatters the Disaster Grief Index,
what you should really get hysterical about is the disappearance of cute white
girls. From CNN’s bloated coverage it is apparent that if one cute white girl
goes missing that is worth at least five thousand people dying in a volcano
eruption in Bolivia. For the value of a dead, ugly American girl you can revert
back to the original index.
Just
this morning I read that there was an earthquake in Pakistan a few months ago
that killed 73,000 people. I don’t even remember hearing about it when it
happened, probably because there weren’t any cute American girls among the
victims for CNN to report. Foreign disasters please take note: If you want to
capture the attention of the American audience, be sure to include a few
American victims—preferably cute white girls.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't say something nice, say it here.